The Historiography Citation Index upgrade

Authors

  • Katja Meden Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Ana Cvek Institute of Contemporary History, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/slo2.0.2021.1.216-235

Keywords:

Historiography Citation Index, HCI, upgrade, citation indexes

Abstract

The fields of humanities and social sciences are often deprived of inclusion within the international citation indexes such as Scopus and Web of Science (WOS). The reason for this offshift in the indexes are commonly associated with the format of published works, e.g. the most common type of published works in humanities are monographs (though the scientific journals are on the rise), which are not typically included in WOS and Scopus. Even though Scopus is far more inclusive of such types and fields in comparison to WOS, there is still a gap to be filled. As a response to this predicament the Institute of Contemporary History developed its own citation index – the Historiography Citation Index (HCI), which was first meant to only track the research production within the institution, but has since been expanded to cover the production of the whole field of Slovene historiography. Over the years HCI was a subject of several upgrades and data harmonization attempts. Even with the upgrades, several shortcomings of the systems were apparent, and therefore, another upgrade was taken into consideration, and after the extensive analysis was performed, we identified the most problematic aspects of the index and began working on another upgrade.

The upgrade was performed in two parts – in the first one, we took upon ourselves to improve the administrative system in which we implemented the ElasticSearch technology to improve our search engine and filtration system, as well as improving the data masks to increase the precision and accuracy of the data input into the index. As a part of the administrative system upgrade we also modeled the MODS application profile to increase the interoperability of our data and therefore, enabling the exchange of our data between different information systems without losing data and its context. In the second part, we upgraded the user interface of the citation index to be more user friendly. In order to increase the coherence of the data display, we implemented a table-like design of the search result, equipped with filters in each column. To increase the visibility of the most important factor of the citation index, number of citations the work has received, we included additional column just for that information. The index aims to enable researchers access to the information on the number of citations, cited works ect. It is also recognised by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) as a valid source of citations and could be used to provide proof of the researchers achievements and scientific excellency, though it is still not recognised as equal to the SICRIS information system.

With the upgrade we increased the efficiency of the citation index, as well as its usability, and with it ensured a more intuitive system to its indexators and users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Science indicators revisited-Science Citation Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation databases. Information Services and Use, 26(4), 293–301.

Bartol, T., Budimir, G., Dekleva-Smrekar, D., Pušnik, M., & Južnič, P. (2014). Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1491–1504.

Curk, L., Budimir, G., Seljak, T., & Gerkes, M. (2006). Linking the SICRIS-COBISS.SI-Web of Science systems. Organizacija znanja, 11(4), 230–235.

Divya, M. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2013). ElasticSearch: An advanced and quick search technique to handle voluminous data. Compusoft, 2(6), 171.

Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (fifth edition). Pridobljeno https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/

Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. V Information Processing & Management (str. 31–44).

Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. V Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (str. 473–496).

Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2008). Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1819–1828.

Južnič, P. (2017). Bibliometrijski indikatorji. Pridobljeno s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9W5glZl97I&feature=youtu.be

Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for information science and technology, 62(11), 2147–2164.

Lazarević, Ž., & Zemljič, I. (2003). Slovenski zgodovinarski indeks citiranosti – izhodišča in pomisleki. [Neobjavljena dokumentacija.]. Ljubljana: Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino.

MODS User Guidelines, Version 3 (Metadata Object Description Schema). Pridobljeno s https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/userguide/introduction.html

Nederhof, A. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.

Pajić, D. (2015). Globalization of the social sciences in Eastern Europe: genuine breakthrough or a slippery slope of the research evaluation practice? Scientometrics, 102(3), 2131–2150.

Pančur, A. (2019a). Preprosta raziskovalna infrastruktura za kompleksne raziskovalne podatke v humanistiki – si4 (Simple research Infrastructure FOR complex research data in digital humanities). [Neobjavljena dokumentacija.]

Pančur, A. (2019b). Specifikacije za izvedbo naročila izdelave Zgodovinarskega indeksa citiranosti (ZIC). [Neobjavljena dokumentacija.]

Pančur, A., & Šorn, M. (2019). Na začetku je bil SIstory: raziskovalna infrastruktura slovenskega zgodovinopisja. V J. Hadalin in Ž. Lazarević (ur.), Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino: 60 let mislimo preteklost (str. 47–58). Ljub­ljana: Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino.

Pančur, A., Šorn, M., & Hadalin, J. (2014). Slovenski indeks citiranosti (SICI): Načrt izgradnje in delovanja. Tehnično poročilo. Pridobljeno s https://www.sistory.si/11686/36153

What is ElasticSearch. Pridobljeno s https://www.elastic.co/what-is/elasticsearch

Published

01.07.2021 — Updated on 06.07.2021

Versions

How to Cite

Meden, K., & Cvek, A. (2021). The Historiography Citation Index upgrade. Slovenščina 2.0: Empirical, Applied and Interdisciplinary Research, 9(1), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.4312/slo2.0.2021.1.216-235 (Original work published July 1, 2021)