The Motif of the Blinding of Polyphemus Between Homer and Callimachus
The Metapoetic Aspect of Poem as Magic Incantation
The paper discusses the metapoetic aspect of a poem as a magic incantation, focusing on the Polyphemus theme repeatedly addressed by various post-Homeric authors. With its motif of the giant’s blinding, the Polyphemus theme readily lent itself to the inclusion of a parallel motif: the poem as a magic tool conducive to attaining one’s objective (including politically motivated ones) in confronting one’s adversary, since a magic incantation blinds its ‘victim’ in much the same way that physical blinding does. Later, when the Polyphemus theme widened to encompass the giant’s love for the Nereid Galathea, the motif of physical and metaphorical blinding was complemented with the motif of poetic self-blinding, as a primal metaphor for the poet’s creation of poetic illusion.
Álvarez Salas, Omar. »Philosophy on Stage and Performance in Argument: Epicharmus vis-à-vis Western Greek Intelligentsia.« V: Politics and Performance in Western Greece: Essays on the Hellenic Heritage of Sicily and Southern Italy, ur. Heather L. Reid, Davide Tanasi in Susi Kimbell, 2. zvezek, 163–192. Sioux Citiy, Iowa: Parnassos Press, 2017.
Alwine, Andrew T. »The Non-Homeric Cyclops in the Homeric Odyssey.« Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 49 (2009): 323–333.
Bing, Peter. »The unruly tongue: Philitas of Cos as scholar and poet.« Classical Philology 98, 4 (2003): 330–48.
Campbell, David A. »Flutes and Elegiac Couplets.« Journal of Hellenic Studies 84 (1964): 63–68.
Clinton, Kevin. »The Mysteries of Demeter and Kore.« V: A Companion to Greek Religion, ur. Daniel Ogden, 342–356. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.
Dickie, Matthew W. »Magic in Classical and Hellenistic Greece.« V: A Companion to Greek Religion, ur. Daniel Ogden, 357–370. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.
Faraone, Christopher. »Magic, Medicine and Eros in the Prologue to Theocritus’ Id. 11.« V: Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, ur. Marco Fantuzzi in Theodore D. Papanghelis, 75–90. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2006.
Glenn, Justin. »The Polyphemus Myth: Its Origin and Interpretation.« Greece and Rome 25.2 (1978), 141–155.
Gowers, Emily. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Griffith, Mark. Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies. Berkeley: California Classical Studies, 2015.
Gutzwiller, Kathryn. »The Herdsman in Greek Thought.« V: Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, ur. Marco Fantuzzi in Theodore D. Papanghelis, 1–23. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2006.
Gutzwiller, Kathryn. A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.
Heath, John. »The Failure of Orpheus.« Transactions of the American Philological Association 124 (1994): 163–196.
Hordern, J. H. »The Cyclops of Philoxenus.« Classical Quarterly 49 (1999): 445–455.
Hordern, J. H. »Cyclopea: Philoxenus, Theocritus, Callimachus, Bion.« Classical Quarterly 54 (2004): 285–292.
Inkret, Andreja. »Aias Mastigophoros: Divine Ostentation within a Play.« Clotho 1, 2 (2019): 16–33.
Jackson, Lucy C. M. M. The Chorus of Drama in the Fourth Century BCE: Presence and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
LeVen, Pauline A. The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Lyric Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Lowrie, Michèle. Horace: Odes and Epodes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Luck, Georg. Arcana Mundi: Magic and the Occult in the Greek and Roman Worlds: a collection of ancient texts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.
Major, Wilfred. »Epicharmus, Tisias, and the Early History of Rhetoric«, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107 (2013): 55–72.
Oliensis, Ellen. »Canidia, canicula, and the decorum of Horace’s ‘Epodes’«. Arethusa 24, 1 (1991): 107–138.
Paschalis, Michael. »Tityrus and Galatea (Virgil, Eclogue 1): An Expected Relationship.« Dictynna 5 (2008): 153–69.
Phillips, E. D. »The Comic Odysseus.« Greece and Rome 6,1 (1959): 58–67.
Sanders, Lionel J. »Dionysius I of Syracuse and the Origins of the Ruler Cult in the Greek World.« Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 40, 3 (1991): 275–287.
Segal, Charles. Orpheus, The Myth of the Poet. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Sfyroeras, Pavlos. »What Wealth Has to Do with Dionysus: Economy and Poetics in Aristophanes’ Plutus.« Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 36 (1995): 231–61.
Shaw, Carl. Satyric Play: The Evolution of Greek Comedy and Satyr Drama. Ney York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Snell, Bruno. The Discovery of the Mind in Greek Philosophy and Literature. New York: Dover Publications, 2011.
Sutton, Dana Ferrin. »Dithyramb as Δρᾶμα: Philoxenus of Cythera’s »Cyclops or Galatea«.« Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 13 (1983): 37–43.
Swift, Laura. »The animal fable and Greek iambus: ainoi and half-ainoi in Archilochus.« V: Gêneros poéticos na Grécia antiga: Confluências e fronteiras, ur. Christian Werner in Breno B. Sebastiani, Werner, C. in Sebastini, 49–77. São Paulo: Humanitas, 2014.
Takakjy Chason, Laura. »Xenophon the Literary Critic: The Poetics and Politics of Praise in Hiero.« Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 57 (2017) 49–73.
Torrance, Isabelle. Metapoetry in Euripides. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Ussher, R. G. »The ‘Cyclops’ of Euripides.« Greece and Rome 18, 2 (1971): 166–179.
Van Dijk, G. J. Ainoi, Logoi, Mythoi. Fables in Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic Greek Literature. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
Wallace, Robert W. »An Early Fifth-Century Athenian Revolution in Aulos Music.« Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 101 (2003): 73–92.
Weiss, Naomi. »Generic Hybridity in Athenian Tragedy.« V: Genre in Archaic and Classical Greek Poetry: Theories and Models, Studies in Archaic and Classical Greek Song, Vol. 4, ur. Margaret Foster, Leslie Kurke in Naomi Weiss, 167–190. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
West, Martin L.. Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1974.
West, Martin L., izd. Iambi et Elegi Graeci ante Alexandrum cantati 1–2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jelena Isak Kres
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in Keria by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.