“Permanent Revolution” to Effect an Ever-Evasive (Ecological) Utopia in Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia
Keywords:ecophobia, dispossession, freedom, biocolonisation, human/non-human dichotomy, ecological utopia
This article aims to analyse Ursula Le Guin’s The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia from an ecological perspective. In her ecologically conscious story, Le Guin explores the (ironic) manifestation and repercussions of humanity’s environmental fear, the virtues and ills of an ever-evasive ecological utopian society that is paradoxically informed by eco-friendly and ecophobic propensities in its pursuit of freedom through the vigorous practice of the art of dispossession, and the possibility of transcending the hyper-separated categories of difference that include the human/non-human dichotomy. What Le Guin seeks in her fictional effort above all is a permanent revolution advocating a never-ending diligent and earnest endeavour to effect an improved, preferable society with a revised awareness of its relations to its human and non-human Others, free from the ethic of exploitation rather than a promotion of an already achieved perfect state.
Bassnett, Susan. 1991. “Remaking the Old World: Ursula Le Guin and the American Tradition.” In Where No Man Has Gone Before: Essays on Women and Science Fiction, edited by Lucie Armitt, 50–66. London: Routledge.
Buell, Lawrence. 2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
Burns, Tony. 2005. “Science and Politics in The Dispossessed: Le Guin and the ‘Science Wars’.” In The New Utopian Politics of Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, edited by Laurence Davis and Peter Stillman, 195–215. Lanham: Lexington Books.
—. 2008. Political Theory, Science Fiction, and Utopian Literature: Ursula K. Le Guin and The Dispossessed. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Carroll, Joseph. 2004. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. New York: Routledge.
Estok, Simon C. 2009. “Theorizing in a Space of Ambivalent Openness: Ecocriticism and Ecophobia.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 16 (2): 203–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isp010.
—. 2015. “Tracking Ecophobia: The Utility of Empirical and Systems Studies for Ecocriticism.” Comparative Literature (University of Oregon) 67 (1): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/00104124-2861991.
Harry, Debra, and Le’a Malia Kanehe. 2005. “The BS in Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS): Critical Questions for Indigenous Peoples.” In The Catch: Perspectives in Benefit Sharing, edited by Beth Burrows, 102–22. Edmonds, Washington: The Edmonds Institute.
Jose, Jim. 1991. “Reflections on the Politics of Le Guin’s Narrative Shifts.” Science Fiction Studies 18 (2): 180–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4240058.
Kellert, Stephen R., and Edward O. Wilson, ed. 1993. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Klarer, Mario. 1992. “Gender and the ‘Simultaneity Principle’: Ursula Le Guin’s ‘The Dispossessed’.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 25 (2): 107–21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24780621.
Latham, Rob. 2007. “Biotic Invasions: Ecological Imperialism in New Wave Science Fiction.” The Yearbook of English Studies 37 (2): 103–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20479304.
Le Guin, Ursula K. 2002. The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia. London: Gollancz.
Lem, Stanisław. 1961. Solaris. Translated by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Marcellino, William. 2009. “Shadows to Walk: Ursula Le Guin’s Transgressions in Utopia.” The Journal of American Culture 32 (3): 203–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-734X.2009.00711.x.
Mathisen, Werner Christie. 2001. “The Underestimation of Politics in Green Utopias: The Description of Politics in Huxley’s Island, Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, and Callenbach’s Ecotopia.” Utopian Studies 12 (1): 56–78.
Moylan, Tom. 2014. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. Edited by Raffaella Baccolini. Bern: Peter Lang.
Nadir, Christine. 2010. “Utopian Studies, Environmental Literature, and the Legacy of an Idea: Educating Desire in Miguel Abensour and Ursula K. Le Guin.” Utopian Studies 21 (1): 24–56. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.21.1.0024.
Pak, Chris. 2016. Terraforming: Ecopolitical Transformations and Environmentalism in Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Ramírez, J. Jesse. 2015. “From Anti-Abundance to Anti-Anti-Abundance Scarcity, Abundance, and Utopia in TwoScience Fiction Writers.” RCC Perspectives 2015 (2): 83–90.
Slaughter, Jane. 1998. “Ursula Le Guin.” Progressive 62 (3): 36–39.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Parisa Changizi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal ELOPE by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.