“Permanent Revolution” to Effect an Ever-Evasive (Ecological) Utopia in Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia

  • Parisa Changizi University of Ostrava
Keywords: ecophobia, dispossession, freedom, biocolonisation, human/non-human dichotomy, ecological utopia


This article aims to analyse Ursula Le Guin’s The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia from an ecological perspective. In her ecologically conscious story, Le Guin explores the (ironic) manifestation and repercussions of humanity’s environmental fear, the virtues and ills of an ever-evasive ecological utopian society that is paradoxically informed by eco-friendly and ecophobic propensities in its pursuit of freedom through the vigorous practice of the art of dispossession, and the possibility of transcending the hyper-separated categories of difference that include the human/non-human dichotomy. What Le Guin seeks in her fictional effort above all is a permanent revolution advocating a never-ending diligent and earnest endeavour to effect an improved, preferable society with a revised awareness of its relations to its human and non-human Others, free from the ethic of exploitation rather than a promotion of an already achieved perfect state.


Download data is not yet available.


Bassnett, Susan. 1991. “Remaking the Old World: Ursula Le Guin and the American Tradition.” In Where No Man Has Gone Before: Essays on Women and Science Fiction, edited by Lucie Armitt, 50–66. London: Routledge.

Buell, Lawrence. 2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.

Burns, Tony. 2005. “Science and Politics in The Dispossessed: Le Guin and the ‘Science Wars’.” In The New Utopian Politics of Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, edited by Laurence Davis and Peter Stillman, 195–215. Lanham: Lexington Books.

—. 2008. Political Theory, Science Fiction, and Utopian Literature: Ursula K. Le Guin and The Dispossessed. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Carroll, Joseph. 2004. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. New York: Routledge.

Estok, Simon C. 2009. “Theorizing in a Space of Ambivalent Openness: Ecocriticism and Ecophobia.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 16 (2): 203–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isp010.

—. 2015. “Tracking Ecophobia: The Utility of Empirical and Systems Studies for Ecocriticism.” Comparative Literature (University of Oregon) 67 (1): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/00104124-2861991.

Harry, Debra, and Le’a Malia Kanehe. 2005. “The BS in Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS): Critical Questions for Indigenous Peoples.” In The Catch: Perspectives in Benefit Sharing, edited by Beth Burrows, 102–22. Edmonds, Washington: The Edmonds Institute.

Jose, Jim. 1991. “Reflections on the Politics of Le Guin’s Narrative Shifts.” Science Fiction Studies 18 (2): 180–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4240058.

Kellert, Stephen R., and Edward O. Wilson, ed. 1993. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Klarer, Mario. 1992. “Gender and the ‘Simultaneity Principle’: Ursula Le Guin’s ‘The Dispossessed’.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 25 (2): 107–21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24780621.

Latham, Rob. 2007. “Biotic Invasions: Ecological Imperialism in New Wave Science Fiction.” The Yearbook of English Studies 37 (2): 103–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20479304.

Le Guin, Ursula K. 2002. The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia. London: Gollancz.

Lem, Stanisław. 1961. Solaris. Translated by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Marcellino, William. 2009. “Shadows to Walk: Ursula Le Guin’s Transgressions in Utopia.” The Journal of American Culture 32 (3): 203–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-734X.2009.00711.x.

Mathisen, Werner Christie. 2001. “The Underestimation of Politics in Green Utopias: The Description of Politics in Huxley’s Island, Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, and Callenbach’s Ecotopia.” Utopian Studies 12 (1): 56–78.

Moylan, Tom. 2014. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. Edited by Raffaella Baccolini. Bern: Peter Lang.

Nadir, Christine. 2010. “Utopian Studies, Environmental Literature, and the Legacy of an Idea: Educating Desire in Miguel Abensour and Ursula K. Le Guin.” Utopian Studies 21 (1): 24–56. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.21.1.0024.

Pak, Chris. 2016. Terraforming: Ecopolitical Transformations and Environmentalism in Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Ramírez, J. Jesse. 2015. “From Anti-Abundance to Anti-Anti-Abundance Scarcity, Abundance, and Utopia in TwoScience Fiction Writers.” RCC Perspectives 2015 (2): 83–90.

Slaughter, Jane. 1998. “Ursula Le Guin.” Progressive 62 (3): 36–39.

How to Cite
ChangiziP. (2020). “Permanent Revolution” to Effect an Ever-Evasive (Ecological) Utopia in Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 17(2), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.2.117-136