Reading a Feminist Epistemology in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam

  • Rano Ringo Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
  • Jasmine Sharma Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Keywords: feminism, epistemology, standpoint, posthumanism, bisexual, Margaret Atwood

Abstract

This paper proposes an epistemological interpretation of Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam (2013). Set in a post-anthropocene world, Atwood’s biopunk work indicates the rise of posthumanism after the “Waterless Flood” that proves apocalyptic. This interpretation is attempted through emphasis on the protagonist Toby’s practice of epistemic writing and her art of storytelling. Divided into two major sections, the article illustrates a revival of an epistemological feminist subculture. The first section discusses the significance of a feminist standpoint in unravelling posthuman reality. It describes Toby’s epistemological endeavor to enlighten the Crakers and enrich their bioengineered minds with the story of their creation. The second section builds upon the idea of bisexual writing and Toby as its prime progenerator and practitioner. The conclusion remarks on the relevance of feminist epistemology in integrating the two communities in the post-anthropocene.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armitt, Lucie. 2012. Where No Man Has Gone Before: Women and Science Fiction. Oxfordshire: Routledge Library Editions.

Atwood, Margaret. 2012. In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination. London: Virago Press.

—. 2013. MaddAddam. London: Bloomsbury.

—. 2013. The Year of the Flood. London: Virago.

Baccolini, Raffaella. 2004. “The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction.” PMLA 119 (3): 518–21. https://doi.org/10.1632/003081204X20587.

Barr, Marleen S. 1987. Alien to Femininity: Speculative Fiction and Feminist Theory. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

—. 1993. Lost in Space: Probing Feminist Science Fiction and Beyond. London: The University of North Carolina Press.

Boyd, Shelley. 2015. “Ustopian Breakfasts: Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam.” Utopian Studies 26 (1): 160–82.

Cixous, Hélène. 1998. “Sorties: Out and Out: Attacks/Ways Out/Forays.” In Literary Theory: An Anthology, edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan, 578–84. New Jersey: Blackwell.

—. 1976. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Translated by Keith and Paula Cohen. Signs 1 (4): 875–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3173239.

Code, Lorraine. 2006. “Women Knowing/Knowing Women: Critical Creative Interventions in the Politics of Knowledge.” In The Sage Handbook of Gender and Women Studies, edited by Kathy Davis, Mary Evans and Judith Lober, 145–66. New York: Sage.

Eagleton, Terry. 1996. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

Friestad, Kari. 2013. “Hélène Cixous: The Effect of Freud and Lacan on Écriture Féminine.” Graduate Seminar: Post-Structuralism. http://fir.ferris.edu:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2323/4337/Kari_Friestad_PS_F2013_ac.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.

Gheluwe, J. Van. 2015. “Contemporary Dystopian Fiction: Literature as Social Critique.” M.A diss., Ghent University. https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/213/.../RUG01-002213087_2015_0001_AC.

Grimbeek, Marinette. 2017. “Margaret Atwood’s Environmentalism: Apocalypse and Satire in the MaddAddam Trilogy.” PhD diss., Karlstad University. https://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1089622/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.

Harding, Sandra. 2003. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. London: Routledge.

Hekman, Susan. 1997. “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs 22 (2): 341–65.

Hoogstraten, Marius Matthijs van. 2020. “Unruly Difference: Richard Kearney, John D. Caputo, and Catherine Keller and a Theopoetics of the Indigeneous.” PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit. https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/79047556/complete+dissertation.pdf

Isikgil, Sena. 2017. “A Study on Plato’s Attitude towards Women.” FLSF 24: 393–404.

Jaggar, Alison M. 2003. “Feminist Politics and Epistemology: The Standpoint of Women.” In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, edited by Sandra Harding, 55–66. London: Routledge.

Jennings, Hope. 2019. “Anthropocene Feminism, Companion Species, and the MaddAddam Trilogy.” Contemporary Women’s Writing 13 (1): 16–33. Accessed October 20, 2019. https://academic.oup.com/cww/article/13/1/16/5432310.

Karbowski, Joseph. 2013. “Aristotle on the Deliberative Abilities of Women.” Apeiron 47 (4): 435–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2013-0061.

Keller, Catherine. 1996. Apocalypse Now and Then: A Feminist Guide to the End of the World. Beacon Press.

McHugh, Nancy Arden. 2011. “More than Skin Deep: Communities and Agent Orange in Aluoi Valley, Vietnam.” In Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge, edited by Heidi E. Grasswick, 183–204. New York: Springer.

Northover, Richard Alan. 2016. “Ecological Apocalypse in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy.” Studia Neophilologica 88: 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2015.1096044.

Published
2020-06-19
How to Cite
RingoR., & SharmaJ. (2020). Reading a Feminist Epistemology in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 17(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.111-124
Section
Articles