The Art of Laughing: A Study of the Tempo-Spatial Matrix in Oliver Goldsmith’s She Stoops to Conquer
Oliver Goldsmith’s She Stoops to Conquer (1773) was staged only two weeks after the publication of his Essay on the Theatre, in which he famously compared sentimental comedies with what he described as laughing comedies. The play thus illustrates Goldsmith’s principles for his ideal laughing comedy. One of the aspects of this type of comedy, which has rarely been addressed, is its representation of the matrix of temporal and spatial elements, or what Mikhail Bakhtin calls a chronotope. The present study is thus aimed at investigating She Stoops to Conquer in terms of Bakhtinian chronotope. The study argues how different chronotopes have influenced the behaviours as well as the decisions of characters in the play. Moreover, it shows that the chronotopic framework can shed new light on the play’s portrayal of the class divisions in the eighteenth century, when the middle class was emerging in England’s social system.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Translated by Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. Texas: University of Texas Press.
—. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translated by Caryl Emerson. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Berg, Maxine. 2005. Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-Century Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.
Borsay, Peter. 2002. “Urban Life and Culture.” In A Companion to Eighteenth-century Britain, edited by H. T. Dickinson, 196–209. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bredvold, Louis I. 1966. The Literature of the Restoration and the Eighteenth Century 1660–1798. New York: Collier Books.
Brown, Marshall. 1991. Preromanticism. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Brooks, Christopher K. 1992. “Goldsmith’s Feminist Drama: She Stoops to Conquer, Silence and Language.” Papers on Language and Literature 28 (1): 38–51.
Corfield, P. J. 1987. “Class by Name and Number in Eighteenth-Century Britain.” History 72 (234): 38–61.
Erdinast-Vulcan, Daphna. 2013. Between Philosophy and Literature: Bakhtin and the Question of the Subject. California: Stanford University Press.
Evans, James. 2015. “Adapting the Stratagem: Goldsmith’s She Stoops to Conquer.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 28 (1): 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769X.2015.1036829.
Flint, Christopher. 1995. “‘The Family Piece’: Oliver Goldsmith and the Politics of the Everyday in Eighteenth-Century Domestic Portraiture.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 29 (2): 127–52.
Goldsmith, Oliver. 1773. “An Essay on the Theatre; or, a Comparison Between Laughing and Sentimental Comedy.” Westminster Magazine January: 398–402.
—. (1773) 1998. "She Stoops to Conquer." In Four Georgian and Pre-Revolutionary Plays, edited by David Thomas, 93–151. London: Macmillan Press.
Harrison, Keith. 2017. Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Film: A Dialogic Lens. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hudson, Nicholas. 2003. Samuel Johnson and the Making of modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Innes, Joanna. 2009. Inferior Politics: Social Problems and Social Policies in Eighteenth-Century Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jordan-Haladyn, Miriam. 2014. Dialogic Materialism: Bakhtin, Embodiment, and Moving Image Art. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Langford, Paul. 2000. Eighteenth-Century Britain: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Löffler, Catharina. 2017. Walking in the City: Urban Experience and Literary Psychogeography in Eighteenth-Century London. Wiesbaden: J.B. Metzler.
McCaw, Dick. 2016. Bakhtin and Theatre Dialogues with Stanislavsky, Meyerhold and Grotowski. New York: Routledge.
Rule, John. 2002. “The Labouring Poor.” In A Companion to Eighteenth-century Britain, edited by H. T. Dickinson, 196–209. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Seitz, Robert W. 1937. “The Irish Background of Goldsmith’s Social and Political Thought.” PMLA 52 (2): 405-411. https://doi.org/10.2307/458598.
Steinby, Liisa. 2013. “Bakhtin’s Concept of the Chronotope: The Viewpoint of an Acting Subject.” In Bakhtin and his Others: (Inter)subjectivity, Chronotope, Dialogism, edited by Liisa Steinby and Tintti Klapuri, 105–127. London and New York: Anthem Press.
Straub, Kristina. 2009. Domestic Affairs: Intimacy, Eroticism, and Violence between Servants and Masters in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Copyright (c) 2020 Mohammad Reza Hassanzadeh Javanian, Farzan Rahmani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal ELOPE by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.