Huang Chun-Chieh and Comparative Philosophy

Multiple Ways of Studying Confucian Ideas and Notions across Texts and Contexts

  • Marko Ogrizek University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Slovenia
Keywords: Huang Chun-chieh, East Asian Confucianisms, comparative philosophy, text, context

Abstract

Confucianism cannot be posited as merely a philosophical tradition, but can nevertheless be said to possess key elements of a philosophy of ethics, which have time and again been able to transcend both the tradition’s historical as well cultural bounds. While Huang Chun-chieh points out that it is more appropriate to speak of Confucianisms, plural, core Confucian values and notions possess the ability to move from context to context while retaining certain characteristics and changing others. The proper approach to the study of Confucianisms should therefore be interdisciplinary and in line with the new method of East Asian Confucianisms, where philosophy should also have an important part to play. Understood within the bounds of the project of Confucian philosophy (a project that can be seen as dynamic and ongoing in the global environment of the 21st century), a broader and more diverse range of expressions of Confucian thought—particularly through the methods of both East Asian Confucianisms and of comparative philosophy as an effort of a more equal and inclusive philosophical dialogue—could help throw new light on important aspects of Confucian philosophical thought. While the methods of East Asian Confucinisms and of comparative philosophy are different in their aims and scope, they also share common sensibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 2006. “Ethnophilosophy, Comparative Philosophy, Pragmatism: Toward a Philosophy of Ethnoscapes.” Philosophy East and West 56 (1): 153–71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4488005.

Culiberg, Luka. 2015. “Japonski jezik med nacijo in imperijem: Tokieda Motoki in aporija nacionalnega jezika.” Asian Studies 3 (1): 225–40.

Goto-Jones, Chris. 2013. What is (Comparative) Philosophy? Philosophy 88 (343): 133–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24778699.

Hmeljak Sangawa, Kristina. 2017. “Confucian Learning and Literacy in Japan’s Schools of the Edo Period.” Asian Studies 5 (2): 153–66.

Huang, Chun-chieh 黄俊傑. 2013a. “‘Higashi Ajia kara kangaeru’ wa ikanishite kanō ka? – Ni-Chū shisōkōryūkeiken o chūshin toshite –「東アジアから考える」はいかにして可能か?―日中思想交流経験を中心として― (How Is It Possible to Think ‘from East Asia’? Centered on Japanese-Chinese Exchange of Ideas).” Translated by Kudō Takushi 工藤卓司. Nihon shisōshigaku 日本思想史学 (Studies of Japanese Intellectual History) 45: 64–80.

–––. 2013b. “On Decontextualization and Recontextualization in East Asian Cultural Interactions: Some Methodological Reflections.” Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia 4: 7–20. http://hdl.handle.net/10112/10491.

–––. 2015. East Asian Confucianisms: Text in Context. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.

–––. 2018. “Why Speak of ‘East Asian Confucianisms’?” In Confucianisms for a Changing World Cultural Order, edited by Roger T. Ames, and Peter D. Hershock, 75–86. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv3zp05k.8.

Huang, Chun-chieh, and John A. Tucker, eds. 2014. Dao Companion to Japanese Confucian Philosophy. Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands.

Koyasu, Nobukuni 子安宣邦. 2015. Jinsaigaku kougi 仁斎学講義 (Lectures on the Jinsai School). Tokyo: Perikansha.

Paramore, Kiri. 2016. Japanese Confucianism: A Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosemont, Henry Jr., and Roger T. Ames. 2009. The Chinese Classic of Family Reverence: A Philosophical Translation of the Xiaojing. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

–––. 2016. Confucian Role Ethics: A Moral Vision for the 21st Century? Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.

Rosemont, Henry Jr. 2016. “Rights-Bearing Individuals and Role-Bearing Persons.” In Confucian Role Ethics: A Moral Vision for the 21st Century?, edited by Chun-chieh Huang, 33–57. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.

Thompson, Kirill Olle. 2017. “Lessons from Zhu Xi’s Views on Inquiry and Learning for Contemporary Advanced Humanities Education and Research.” Asian Studies 5 (2): 11–42.

Tucker, John Allen. 1994. “Beixi’s ‘Ziyi’ and Ancient Learning Philosophical Lexicography.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 4 (1): 67–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25182830.

Wildman Nakai, Kate. 1980. “The Naturalization of Confucianism in Tokugawa Japan: The Problem of Sinocentrism.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 40 (1): 157–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2718919.

Yang, Xiao. 2007. “How Confucius Does Things with Words: Two Hermeneutic Paradigms in the ‘Analects’ and Its Exegeses: In Memoriam: Benjamin Schwartz.” The Journal of Asian Studies 66 (2): 497–532. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20203166.

Published
2020-09-22
How to Cite
OgrizekM. (2020). Huang Chun-Chieh and Comparative Philosophy. Asian Studies, 8(3), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.3.91-110