From Confucianism to Nationalism

Fictive Kinship and the Making of the Vietnamese

  • Trong Duong Tran Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Institute for Sino-Nom Studies, Hanoi, Vietnam
Keywords: Confucianism, race, fictive kinship, nationalism, invented tradition

Abstract

This paper examines how political discourses have changed as scholars seek answers regarding the origins of the Vietnamese people. The origin(s) of the Vietnamese people has long been a subject of debate. Confucian scholars from the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries claimed themself to be descendants of Han people, the successors of the Han civilization. The colonial scholars (from 1860 to 1945), when using the theory of race, anthropology, and social evolution theory, thought that the Annam people were a hybrid breed, still in the process of evolution, and needed to be enlightened civilized. Indigenous scholars combined the Han ideology of Confucianism and the ideology of the French to claim that the Vietnamese were the descendants of the Hùng Vương. This ideological transformation was aimed at calling for patriotism, fighting against the French, and defending the nation from colonial domination. The results reveal that the process of changing paradigms in Confucian thought through colonialism led to the formation of fictive kinship and the spread of nationalism in Vietnam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berg, Manfred, and Simon Wendt, eds. 2011. Racism in the Modern World: Historical Perspective on Cultural Transfer and Adaptation. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.

Choi, Byung Wook. 2004. Southern Vietnam under the Reign of Minh Mạng (1820–1841): Central Policies and Local Response. Ithaca: Cornell.

CNRTL. n. d. “Patrie.” https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/patrie.

Duiker, William J. 1971. “Phan Boi Chau: Asian Revolutionary in a Changing World.” The Journal of Asian Studies 31 (1): 77–88.

Đào, Duy Anh. 1932. Hán Việt từ điển (Dictionary of Sino-Vietnamese). Edited by Hãn Mạn Tử - Giao Tiều. Huế: Impremerie Tieng Dan.

Đông, Kinh Nghĩa Thục. 1906. Cải lương mông học Quốc sử Giáo khoa thư 改良蒙學國史教科書 (Reformed Textbook of National History for Primary Education). Carved woodblock. Vietnam National Library. Call number: R.1946.

Fordham, Signithia. 1988. “Racelessness as a Factor in Black Students’ School Success: Pragmatic Strategy or Pyrrhic Victory?” Harvard Educational Review 58 (1): 54–85.

Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.

Giran, Paul. 2019 (1904). Psychologie du peuple Annamite: le caractère national - l’évolution historique- intellectuelle, sociale et politique. Hanoi: Hoi Nha Van.

Hồ, Chí Minh. 2000 (1941). “Lịch sử nước ta (History of Our Nation). Việt Minh tuyên truyền bộ xuất bản.” In Hồ Chí Minh toàn tập (A Complete Collection of Hồ Chí Minh’s Works), vol. 3, 221–29. Hanoi: Chính trị Quốc gia.

Hoàng, Đạo Thành. 1906. Việt sử tân ước toàn biên 越史新約全編 (Complete Compilation of a New Summary of Việt History). Institute for Sino-Nom Studies. Call number: A.1507.

Hue, Gustave. 1937. Dictionnaire Vietnamien- Chinois- Français. Hanoi: Imprimerie Trung Hoà.

Kelley, Liam Christopher. 2003. “Vietnam as a ‘Domain of Manifest Civility’ (Văn Hiến Chi Bang).” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 3 (1): 63–76.

–––. 2006. “Confucianism in Vietnam: A State of the Field Essay.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 1 (1–2): 314–70.

–––. 2012. “The Biography of the Hồng Bàng Clan as a Medieval Vietnamese Invented Tradition.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 7 (2): 87–130.

–––. 2015a. “From Moral Exemplar to National Hero: The Transformations of Trần Hưng Đạo and the Emergence of Vietnamese Nationalism.” Modern Asian Studies 49: 1963–93.

–––. 2015b. “Inventing Traditions in Fifteenth-Century Vietnam.” In Imperial China and its Southern Neighbours, edited by Victor Mair, and Liam C. Kelley, 161–93. Singapore: ISEAS.

Legrand de la Liraye, Théophile Marie 1865. Notes Historiques sur la Nation Annamite. Saigon.

Luo, Jingwen 羅景文. 2011. “Dongya Han wenhua zhishi quan de liudong yu hudong––yi Liang Qichao yu Pan Peizhu dui xifang sixiangjia yu Riben weixin renwu de shuxie wei li 東亞漢文化知識圈的流動與互動─以梁啟超與潘佩珠對西方思想家與日本維新人物的書寫為例 (Transfers and Interactions among the Intellectual Communities of East Asian Chinese Character Culture Sphere: Description of the Western Thinkers and the Meiji Restoration Intellectuals by Liang Qichao and Phan Boi Chau).” Taida lishi xuebao 臺大歷史學報 (National Taiwan University Journal) 48: 51–96.

Liu, Lydia H. 1995. Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity: China, 1900–1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lý, Văn Phức. 1841. Chu nguyên tạp vịnh thảo 周原雜詠草 (Manuscript of Chu Nguyen’s Works). Institute for Sino-Nom Studies. Call number: VHv.2258.

Motyl, Alexander J., ed. 2001. Encyclopedia of Nationalism, vol. 2. San Diego: Academic Press.

Nguyễn, Trãi 阮廌. 1435. Nam Việt dư địa chí 南 越 輿 地 誌 (Geographical Monograph on Nam Việt). In Ức Trai di tập 抑齋遺集, vol.6. Lí Tử Tấn 李子晉 discussed, Nguyễn Thiên Túng 阮 天 縱 noted, Carved in 1868 by Dương Bá Cung. Institute for Sino-Nom Studies. Call number: VHv.1772.

Nguyễn, Bá Trác 阮伯卓. 1917. “Dân tộc chủ nghĩa luận 民族主義論 (A Discussion of Nationalism).” Nam Phong tạp chí 南風雜志 1: 5–18.

Ngô, Sĩ Liên 吳士連. 1479. Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư 大越史記全書 (Complete Book of Historical Records of Đại Việt). 本引田利章校訂句讀,明治十七年冬十月,埴山堂反刻 1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard-Yenching Institute.

Nguyễn, Thị Hường. 2013. Nghiên cứu sách dạy lịch sử Việt Nam viết bằng chữ Hán và chữ Nôm (A Study on Vietnamese Historical Textbooks Written in Sino- Nom Scripts). Hanoi: Thế giới.

Nguyễn, Phúc Anh. 2014. “Hung Kings Myths and Ideological Struggle to Establish Vietnamese Identity.” IUAES Inter-Congress: The Future with/of Anthropologies. International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. 15–18 May. Chiba, Japan.

Nguyễn, Thụy Phương. 2019. “Sứ mệnh khai hóa: nguồn gốc của những ngụy biện phân biệt chủng tộc (Mission of Civilization: The Root of Racial Discrimination).” Tia sáng Review 15.

Nguyễn, Tuấn Cường, and Lương Thị Thu. 2017. “Xixue dongjian yu shuji jiaoliu: jindai Yuenan Xin ding guomin duben de ou ya lucheng 西學東漸與書籍交流:近代越南《新訂國民讀本》的歐亞旅程 (Dissemination of Western Learning in the East and the Book Exchange: A Study of the Late Imperial Vietnam’s Revised Version of the Citizen Reader).” Zhongzheng Hanxue Yanjiu 30 (2): 177–206.

Quốc, sử quán triều Nguyễn 阮朝國史館. 1844. Đại Nam Thực Lục Chính biên 大南寔錄正編 (Chronicle of Nguyễn Dynasty). Đệ nhị kỷ 第二紀 (Period of Minh Mạng), vol. 26 (卷 26). The Oriental Institute Keio University.

Pasquier, Pierre Marie Antoine. 1907. L’Annam d’autrefois. Paris: A. Challamel.

Phạm, Quỳnh. 1931. “Du lịch xứ Lào.” Part I /II. Nam Phong tạp chí (Nam Phong Magazine) 158 (1).

Phan, Bội Châu. 2015 (1909). Việt Nam quốc sử khảo 越南國史考 (Study on Vietnam History). Translated by Chương Thâu. Hanoi: Văn hóa Thông tin.

Robertson, Roland. 1995. “Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity.” In Global Modernities, edited by Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash, and Roland Robertson, 25–44. London: Sage.

Salon, Albert. 1983. L’Action culturelle de la France dans le monde. Paris: Fernand Nathan.

Schreiner, Louis-Alfred. 1906. Abrégé de l’histoire Annamite. Saigon: L’auteur.

Smith, Anthony D. 2009. Ethno-Symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. London, New York: Routledge.

Trần, Quang Đức. 2013. Ngàn năm áo mũ: lịch sử trang phục Việt Nam giai đoạn 1009-1945 (One Thousand Years of Caps and Robes: A History of Vietnamese Clothing in the Period 1009–1945). Hanoi: Thế giới.

Trần, Trọng Dương. 2018. Nguyễn Trãi quốc âm từ điển (A Dictionary of 15th Century Vietnamese). Hanoi: Văn học.

–––. 2019. Việt Nam thế kỷ X: những mảnh vỡ lịch sử (Vietnam in 10th Century: Historical Fragments). Hanoi: Su Pham.

Trần, Trọng Kim. 2005 (1920). Việt Nam sử lược 越南史略 (Précis d’histoire de Việt Nam). Ha Noi: Nxb Văn hóa Thông tin.

Trương, Vĩnh Ký. 1875. Cours d’histoire Annamite a l’usage des écoles de la Basse-Cochinchine. Saigon: Imprimerie du Governement.

Woodside, Alexander. 1970. Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2020-05-20
How to Cite
TranT. D. (2020). From Confucianism to Nationalism. Asian Studies, 8(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.2.165-183
Section
National and Cultural History