Aesthetics of the Classical Period of the Islamic Mughal Empire in India through a Portrait of Abū al-Fath Jalāl al-Dīn Muhammad Akbar

  • Nina PETEK Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana
Keywords: Mughal aesthetics, miniature painting, hybrid art, Akbar the Great

Abstract

The reign of Abū al-Fath Jalāl al-Dīn Muhammad Akbar (1556–1605) was a fruitful period of the political, cultural and spiritual synthesis of Persian, Indian, and European tradition, as well as an artistic and aesthetic renaissance. This cosmopolitan, universal and charismatic ruler strived for the external, political, material and spiritual well-being of his colourful empire. In search of a balance between the external and internal, and in his endeavours for the unification and uniformity of India he gradually created a completely new style of Mughal arts, which is a stunning reflection of his personality’s transformations, principles, insights, interests, and spiritual growth.

The paper focuses on a psychological portrait of the ruler, who dictated aesthetics and the style of the classical period of Mughal arts which consists of the three basic developmental phases of Akbar’s enigmatic character. The thesis on the parallel development of Akbar’s personality and Mughal arts is supported by research on the influence of certain European and Persian aesthetic elements, and mainly on the influence of Indian philosophical-religious tradition (the doctrines on rasa, bhakti, yoga, and tantra). The early period of Mughal arts, with predominantly realistic elements, coincides with the ruler’s dynamic, youthful enthusiasm and immense curiosity to acquaint himself the most varied aspects of external events and appearances. The second, the mature period, which enriches this earlier realism by means of mystical elements and the symbolism of Indian pre-Mughal painting, is marked by the shift into the interior and by searching for the harmony between the material and spiritual. In the late period of Mughal painting, however, reflexive and lyrical works prevail, which are a reflection of completion of Akbar’s spiritual quests, and the unique project of multifaceted synthesis that he undertook and promoted. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nina PETEK, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana

assistant

References

Abu’l-Fazl, ibn Mubarak (‘Allami). 1873. The Ain I Akbari. Vol. I. Transl. from the original Persian by H. Blochmann. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.

Bailey, Gauvin Alexander. 1998. “The Indian Conquest of Catholic Art: The Mughals, the Jesuits, and Imperial Mural Painting.” Art Journal 57: 24–30. Accessed October 28, 2017. http://www.jstor.org.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/stable/777989.

Brown, Percy. 1924. Indian Painting under the Mughals. A.D. 1550 to A.D. 1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burchett, Patton E. 2012. “Bhakti Religion and Tantric Magic in Mughal India: Kacchvāhās, Rāmānandīs, and Nāths, circa 1500–1750.” PhD diss., Columbia University.

Burn, Richard, ed. 1937. The Cambridge History of India. Volume IV. The Mughal Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Butler Schofield, Katherine. 2015. “Learning to Taste the Emotions. The Mughal Rasika.” In Tellings and Texts: Music, Literature and Performance in North India, edited by Francesca Orsini and Katherine Butler Schofield, 407–21. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

Canby R., Sheila. 2005. Islamic Art in Detail. London: British Museum Press.

Cary-Welch, Stuart. 1978. Imperial Mughal Painting. London: Chatto & Windus.

Cary-Welch, Stuart et al. 1987. The Emperor’s Album. Images of Mughal India. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Chakraverty, Anjan. 2005. Indian Miniature Painting. New Delhi: Lustre Press.

Cleveland Beach, Milo. 2002. Mughal and Rajput Painting. (From the Series: The New Cambridge History of India, I: 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. 1910. “Originality in Mughal Painting.” The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, July: 874–881. Accessed October 15, 2017. http://www.jstor.org.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/stable/25189748.

Eaton, Richard Maxwell. 1993. The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204– 1760. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Ernst, Carl W. 2005. “Situating Sufism and Yoga.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Third Series 15: 15–43. Accessed October 28, 2017. http://www.jstor.org. nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/stable/25188502.

Gonzalez, Valerie. 2015. Aesthetic Hybridity in Mughal Painting, 1526–1658. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Hatley, Shaman. 2007. “Mapping the Esoteric Body in the Islamic Yoga of Bengal.” History of Religions 46: 351–68. Accessed October 28, 2017. http://www. jstor.org.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/stable/10.1086/518813.

Kossak, Steven. 1997. Indian Court Painting. 16th–19th Century. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Lorenzen, David N. 2002. “Early Evidence for Tantric Religion.” In The Roots of Tantra, edited by Katherine Anne Harper and Robert L. Brown, 25–36. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Minissale, Gregory. 2009. Images of Thought: Visuality in Islamic India 1550–1750. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Schimmel, Annemarie. 2004. The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture. London: Reaktion Books.

Smith, Vincent A. 1917. Akbar the Great Mogul. 1542–1605. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tittley, Norah M. 1981. Dragons in Persian, Mughal and Turkish Art. London: The British Library.
Published
2018-01-30
How to Cite
PETEK, N. (2018). Aesthetics of the Classical Period of the Islamic Mughal Empire in India through a Portrait of Abū al-Fath Jalāl al-Dīn Muhammad Akbar. Asian Studies, 6(1), 73-109. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2018.6.1.73-109
Section
Islamic Theory and Philosophy