Following the Way of the Ancient Kings: The Concept of “Learning” in the Teachings of Ogyū Sorai

Marko OGRIZEK

Abstract


Ogyū Sorai conceptualizes “learning” as the study of the way of the ancient kings. The way thus represents the rites, music, penal laws and administrative systems which the ancient kings established. Making faith in the sages the foundation of learning, Sorai designates the ancient kings as intermediaries between the ordering activity of heaven and human society. This article tries to examine some of the implications of such a conceptualization, both for the proposed system of social organization as well as for Sorai’s own project of elucidating the way.


Keywords


Ogyū Sorai, Tokugawa Confucianism, learning, way of the ancient kings, sages

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bitō, Masahide. 1978. “Ogyū Sorai and the Distinguishing Features of Japanese Confucianism.” In Thought in the Tokugawa Period 1600–1868, edited by Tetsuo Najita and Irwin Scheiner, 153–60. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

Chunqiu Zuozhuan 春秋左傳 (The Chronicle of Zuo). 2017. In Chinese Text Project. Accessed January 14, 2017. http://ctext.org/chun–qiu-zuo-zhuan.

Liji 禮記 (Book of Rites). 2017. In Chinese Text Project. Accessed January 14, 2017. http://ctext.org/liji.

Mengzi 孟子 (Mencius). 2017. In Chinese Text Project. Accessed January 14, 2017. http://ctext.org/mengzi.

Ogyū, Sorai 荻生徂徠. 1974 (1973). Nihon shisō taikei 36. Ogyū Sorai. 日本思想 体系36・荻生徂徠. (The System of Japanese Thought 36. Ogyū Sorai). Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.

Ogyū, Sorai. 2006. Ogyū Sorai’s Philosophical Masterworks. Translated and edited by John Tucker. Honolulu: Association for Asian Studies, University of Hawai’i Press (Asian Interactions and Comparisons).

Shijing 詩經 (Book of Poetry). 2017. In Chinese Text Project. Accessed January 14, 2017. http://ctext.org/book-of-poetry.

Wildman Nakai, Kate. 1980. “The Naturalization of Confucianism in Tokugawa Japan: The Problem of Sinocentrism.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 40 (1), Jun.: 157–99. Accessed January 14, 2017. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2718919.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.2.139-151

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


Copyright (c) 2017 Marko Ogrizek

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

0.05
2016CiteScore
 
 
38th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts
(Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani) 

Print ISSN: 2232-5131
Online ISSN: 2350-4226