Skilful Practice in the Zhuangzi: Putting the Narratives in Context
The Zhuangzi, like many other early Chinese texts, is a composite work consisting of relatively short textual units. Despite its composite nature, the Zhuangzi is often approached as a philosophical work, which (at least in part or parts) can be viewed as philosophically coherent. As a result, the Zhuangzi as a whole (or several wholes) is usually taken (at least implicitly) as the context in which all the textual units are read and understood.
In contrast, this paper explores alternative ways to establish context for individual textual units in the Zhuangzi. The famous short narratives about skilful practice (often introducing the idea of perfect craftsmanship) are taken as an example, and the possible contexts are examined along two lines of inquiry: 1) the narratives are read within their immediate context of the textual unit; 2) the vocabulary used in the narratives is checked against other textual units in the Zhuangzi where the vocabulary appears. The paper argues that diverse contexts can be established for seemingly similar narratives. The narratives about skilful practice are viewed as a literary device that can be used in various contexts for various purposes. The paper thus demonstrates that the received Zhuangzi can be read as a process of putting shared narratives and terms in contexts and using them for different ends. The paper concludes by suggesting that the proposed reading highlights and retains meanings that are necessarily obscured by any reading that establishes the whole Zhuangzi as the primary context.
Defoort, Carine. 2012. “Instruction Dialogues in the Zhuangzi: An ‘Anthropological’ Reading.” Dao 11: 459–78.
Eno, Robert. 1996. “Cook Ding’s Dao and the Limits of Philosophy”. In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Paul Kjellberg
and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 127–15. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Graham, Angus C. 1981. The Seven Inner Chapters and Other Writings from the Book Chuang-tzu. London: George Allen & Unwin.
–––, ed. 1990. “How Much of Chuang-tzu Did Chuang-tzu Write?” In Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature, 283–321. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Graziani, Romain. 2005. “When Princes Awake in Kitchens: Zhuangzi’s Rewriting of a Culinary Myth.” In Of Tripod and Palate: Food, Politics, and Religion in Traditional China, edited by Roel Sterckx, 62–74. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guo, Qingfan 郭慶藩, ed. 1985. Zhuangzi jishi 莊子集釋 (Collected Explanations of the Zhuangzi). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Klein, Esther. 2011. “Were there ‘Inner Chapters’ in the Warring States? A New Examination of the Evidence about the Zhuangzi.” T’oung Pao 96: 299–369.
Knoblock, John. 1988. Xunzi. A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford UP.
–––. 1994. Xunzi. A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, vol. 3. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Kohn, Livia. 2014. Zhuangzi: Text and Context. St. Petersburg (Florida): Three Pines Press.
Li, Xiangfeng 黎翔鳳. 2009. Guanzi jiao zhu 管子校注 (An Annotated Guanzi), 2 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Liu, Xiaogan. 1994. Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan.
Liu, Xiaogan. 2014. “Textual Issues in the Zhuangzi.” In Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy edited by Liu Xiaogan, 129–58. Dordrecht: Springer.
Meyer, Dirk. 2015. “Truth Claim with no Claim to Truth: Text and Performance of the ‘Qiushui’ Chapter of the Zhuangzi.” In Literary Forms of Argument in Early
China, edited by Joachim Gentz and Dirk Meyer, 297–340. Leiden: Brill.
Moeller, Hans-Georg. 2015. “Paradoxes of Health and Power in the Zhuangzi.” In New Visions of the Zhuangzi, edited by Livia Kohn, 70–81. St. Petersburg (Florida): Three Pines Press.
Needham, Joseph. 1956. Science and Civilization in China, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Pang, Pu 龐朴. 1994. “Jie niu zhi jie 解牛之解.” Xueshu Yuekan 学术月刊 (Academic Monthly) 3: 11–20.
Puett, Michael. 2003. “‘Nothing Can Overcome Heaven’: The Notion of Spirit in the Zhuangzi.” In Hiding the World in the World: Uneven Discourses in the Zhuangzi, edited by Scott Cook, 248–262. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Richter, Matthias. 2014. “Handling a Double-Edged Sword: Controlling Rhetorics in Early China.” Asiatische Studien 68 (4): 1021–68.
Rickett, W. Allyn. 1998. Guanzi: Politic, Economic, and Philosophical Essays from Early China, vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Roth, Harold. 1991a. “Who Compiled the Chuang Tzu?” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts. Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham., edited by Henry Rosemont, 79–128. La Salle: Open Court.
–––. 1991b “Psychology and Self-Cultivation in Early Taoistic Thought.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 51 (2): 599–650.
–––. 1994. “Redaction Criticism and the Early History of Taoism.” Early China 19: 1–46.
Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Wang, Xianqian 王先謙, ed. 2010. Xunzi jijie 荀子集解 (Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.
Watson, Burton. 1970. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York and London: Columbia UP.
Yearley, Lee H. 1996. “Zhuangzi’s Understanding of Skillfulness and the Ultimate Spiritual State.” In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Paul Kjellberg and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 152–82. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Copyright (c) 2017 Dušan Vávra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published (print and online) in journal Asian Studies by Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.