Marked Geminates as Evidence of Sonorants in Sylheti Bangla: An Optimality Account

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.11.1.99-112

Keywords:

gemination, sonorant, obstruent, constraints, optimality theory

Abstract

This paper analyzes the universal concept that sonorants are marked geminates in the gemination process of Sylheti Bangla (henceforth SHB). Evidence from SHB suggests that when SHB speakers confront borrowed words with sonorant initial or obstruent initial heterosyllabic clusters, it is invariably the sonorant that gets assimilated. In addition, SHB data indicates that when faced with choices between two sonorants of the heterosyllabic clusters, speakers opt for the less sonorous one for gemination. Given this phenomenon, the proposal that sonorant gemination is absent in SHB could not be the ultimate one as it receives additional support from the fact that SHB also possesses many underlying sonorant geminations. Based on this investigation the hierarchy of the constraints *GG*RR>>*LL*NN is proposed for analyzing the gemination process in SHB. Finally, this paper illustrates some additional constraints in the SHB gemination process found to be necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, M. (2013). Sylhet: bhasha boichitra o shabda shampad (A phenomenon of sylheti: Language and word bank). Ittadi Grantha Prokash.

Beckman, J. (1998). Positional faithfulness. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusettes, Amherst.

Blevins, J. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Boersma, P. (1998). Functional typology: Formalizing the interaction between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Clements, G. N. (1990). The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech (pp. 283-333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, S. (1998). Syllable in optimality theory. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 23, 181-211.

Davis, S. (2011). Geminates. In M. van Oostendorp et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, (Vol. 2, pp. 873-897). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dutta, H. (2017). Strength asymmetries and Pali geminates: An OT account. The EFL journal 8. pp. 49-65.

Flemming, E. (1996). Evidence for Constraints on Contrast: The dispersion theory of contrast. UCLA working papers in Phonology 1, pp. 86-106.

Flemming, E. (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 232-276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gouskova, M. (2002). Falling sonority onsets, loanwords and syllable contact. In M. Andronis, E. Debenport, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), CLS 37: The main session. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Lingustic Society (Vol. 1, pp. 175-186). CLS.

Ito, J., & Mester, A. (1999). The phonological lexicon. In N. Tsujimura (Ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics (pp. 62-100). Oxford: Blackwell.

Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2006). Systematic markedness and faithfulness. In J. E. Cihlar et al. (Eds.), Papers from the 39th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 665-689). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kubozono, H. (2017). Introduction to the Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants. Oxford University Press.

Ladefoged, P., & Ian, M. (1997). The Sounds of the World’s languages. UK: Blackwell.

Liljencrants, J., & Lindblom, B. (1972). Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems. The Role of Perceptual Contrast Language, 48, pp. 839-862. doi:10.2307/411991

Lindblom, B. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel system. In J. Ohala & J. Jaegar (Eds.), Experimental Phonology, 13-44. Orlando: Academic Press.

Kawahara, S. (2007). Sonorancy and geminacy. In L. Bateman et. al (Eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 32: Papers in OT.III, (pp. 145-186). Amherst, Mass.: GLSA

Kubozono, H. (2017). Introduction to the phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants. Oxford University Press.

Ohala, J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In C. Jones (Eds.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives (pp. 237-278). London: Longman.

Pajak, B. (2009). Contextual constraints on gemination: The case of Polish. BLS 35, 1, pp.269- 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v35i1.3617

Padgett, J. (2003). Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 39-87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021879906505

Podseva, R. (2002). Segmental constraints on geminates and their implications for Typology. Paper presented at January 2002 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, 3-6 Jan.

Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rice, K. (1992). On Deriving Sonority: A Structural Account of Sonority Relationships. Phonology, 9(1), 61-99. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4420046.

Taylor, M. (1985). Some patterns of geminate consonants. The University of Chicago Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp. 120-129.

Vennemann, T. (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Downloads

Published

30.01.2021

How to Cite

Goswami, . A. (2021). Marked Geminates as Evidence of Sonorants in Sylheti Bangla: An Optimality Account . Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 11(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.11.1.99-112

Issue

Section

Research articles