Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
Keywords:clitic, affix, agreement, prosody, Santali
This paper investigates the syntactic configuration of pronominal number marking in Santali. Syntactic, morphological and prosodic restrictions show that pronominal number markers have properties of an affix as well as a clitic. A marker is an affix due to the fact that it cannot participate in a binding relation with other arguments. A pronominal number marker also functions as a clitic since it is attached to prosodically the most prominent constituent. The arguments that trigger object agreement do not manifest one particular case, but instead indicate a dissociation between a case and object agreement. On the other hand, the argument with subject agreement manifests nominative case only, indicating an association between nominative case and subject agreement. Both subject and object agreement are sensitive to case that indicates a property of an affix. Keeping in view the distribution of the pronominal number markers, we analyze feature checking of the two parameters, namely agreement and case in Santali.
Anderson, G. D. S. (2007). The Munda Verb: Typological Perspectives. Berlin–New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Baker, M. (2015). Case (No. 146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M., & Kramer, R. (2016). Doubling clitics are pronouns: Reduce and interpret (Manuscript).Rutgers University and Georgetown University.
Bhatt, R. (2005). Long-distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 757–807. Retrieved from at https://people.umass.edu/bhatt/papers/bhatt-lda-nllt05.pdf.
Bhattacharya, T. (1999). The structure of the Bangla DP. Department of Linguistics (Doctoral Dissertation). University College London. Accessed at http://people.du.ac.in/~tanmoy/papers/Tanmoy_UCL_PHD.pdf
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, No. 15. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Massachusetts: MITWPL.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by Phase, No. 18. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MITWPL.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries, the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), In honour of Howard Lasnik. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax (89–155). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Comrie, B. (2005). Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (Eds.), The world at language structures (398-403). New York: Oxford University Press.
Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davison, A. (2004). Structural case, lexical case and the verbal projection. In Clause structure in South Asian languages, 199-225. Springer, Dordrecht. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-2719-2_7
Ghosh, A. (2008). Santali. In Anderson (ed.), The Munda Languages. 434-507. New York: Routledge.
Givón, T. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic (149−188). New York: Academic Press.
Halpern, A. L. (1992). Topics in the placement and morphology of clitics (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
Harizanov, B. (2014). Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(4), 1033-1088.
Hock, H. H. (2013). Backernagel is Wackernagel Lite. On the “P-Minus 2” Clitics of Santali. Lingua posnaniensis, 55(2), 67-75.
Kidwai, A. (2005). Santali ‘Backernagel’ Clitics: Distributing Clitic Doubling. In R. Singh (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (189–207). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Kramer, R. (2014). Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(2), 593-634. Retrieved from http://faculty.georgetown.edu/rtk8/Clitic%20Doubling%20or%20Object%20Agreement.pdf
Leslau, W. (1995). Reference grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.
Matushansky, O. (2006). Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 69–109.
Mavrogiorgos, M. (2010). Clitics in Greek: A minimalist account of proclisis and enclisis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Nagaraja, K. S. (1993). Agreement in Khasi and Munda languages. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute, 53, 271-276. Accessed at https://www.jstor.org/stable/42936449.
Neukom, L. (2001). Santali. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
Nevins, A. (2011). Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 939–971.
Osada T. (2008). Mundari. In Anderson (ed.), The Munda Languages. 99–164. New York: Routledge.
Siewierska, A. (2005). Alignment of verbal person marking. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures (406-409). New York: Oxford University Press.
Subbarao, K. V. (2012). South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suñer, M. (1988). The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6, 391–434.
Taylor, A. (1995). The distribution of object clitics in Koine Greek. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 2(1), 7.
Thráinsson, H. (1979). On Complementation in Icelandic. New York: Garland.
Woolford, E. (2006). Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic inquiry, 37 (1), 111-130.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Mayuri J. DILIP, Rajesh KUMAR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published online in journal Acta Linguistica Asiatica by Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.