Empty category in Persian relative clauses

  • Mahmoud MOBARAKI Assistant Professor in linguistics, Jahrom University
  • Abolfazl MOSAFFA JAHROM Jahrom University
Keywords: relative clause, resumptive pronoun, empty category, subjacency condition, predicate logic


Empty categories are one of the fundamental parts of generativist’s view towards language. Empty operators, the so-called null elements, which are syntactically active in relative clauses and possibly move into [spec, CP], have reportedly been found in different languages. However, there is no solid evidence for the existence of empty operators in Persian relative clauses. Despite this, syntactic evidences such as theta theory, argument structure and subjacency condition provide satisfactory provable tests in favor of their role in Persian grammar. Namely, Persian relative clauses contain resumptive pronouns which may be covert. Their movement into [spec, CP] can precisely account for subjacency effect in relative clauses. Resumptive pronouns can occupy the subject as well as the object position. This articles attempts to introduce empty operators to Persian syntax, and shows that in such a way it is possible to account for the peculiar behavior of the Persian complementizer “ke” and its obligatory nature.


Download data is not yet available.


Abolqasemi, M. (2016). A Historical Grammar of Persian Language. Tehran: Samt.

Abolqasemi, M. (1996). The History of Persian Language. Tehran: Samt.

Ahangar, A. A. (2000). The Subordinate Clause Construction in Persian based on Government and Binding Theory. Ph.D. Dessertation. Tehran University.

Carnie, A. (2002). Syntax: a generative introduction. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Studies in generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistics typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Cowper, E. (1992). A concies introduction to syntactic theory. Chicago, London: Chicago University Press.

Culicover, P. W. (1997). Principles and parameters: an introduction to syntactic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Estaji, A. (2000). Historical study of “ke” multifunctions in Modern Persian. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects.

Haegeman., L. (1992). Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Harris, A. C., & Campbel, L. (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hornstein, H., Nunes, J., & Grohmann, K. (2006). Understanding minimalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horrocks, G. (1987). Generative grammar. London: Longman.

Hurford, J., & Heasly, B. (1996). Semantics: a course book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jaeggli, O. (1981). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic description. Cambridge,. Mass: MIT Press.

Kayne, R. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.

Kent, R. G. (1953). Old Persian. New Haven: American oriental society.

Khayampour, A. (1973). Persian Grammar. Tabriz: Tehran Bookshop.

Lasnik, H. (1988). A course in GB syntax: lectures on binding and empty categories. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Lazard, G. (1957). Grammaire du persan contemporain. Paris: Klincksieck.

Miremadi, S. A. (2008). Persian Syntax, A G. B-Based Analysis. Tehran: Samt.

Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and Categories. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT Press.

Radford, A. (2006). Minimalist syntax: exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Riemsdijk, H., & Tushyeh, H. (1998). A contrastive analysis of English and Arabic in relativization. Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics, 34, 141-152.

Riemsdijk, H., & Edwin, W. (1986). Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Safavi, K., (1994). Some Properties of Persian Relative Clause. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of Persian Linguistics. Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran.

Taghvaipour, M. A. (2005). Persian Relative Clause in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Ph.D. Desertation. University of Essex.

Trask, R. L. (1993). A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.

Windfuhr, G. L. (1978). Persian Grammar: History and State of its Study. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.

Youhanaee, M. (1997). The Acquisition of the English Complementizer Phrase by Adult Persian Speakers. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Essex.

How to Cite
MOBARAKIM., & MOSAFFA JAHROMA. (2019). Empty category in Persian relative clauses. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 9(2), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.9.2.53-70
Research Articles