Understanding Sarcastic Metaphorical Expression in Hindi through Conceptual Integration Theory
Metaphorical expressions are one of the most indispensable aspects of human language, thought and action. Their meanings are figurative, which in other words means that they carry literal meanings, which are in direct opposition to the intended or primary meanings. Metaphors are not only limited to being used in figurative writing and speaking but they are also pervasively used in everyday language. Irony, sarcasm, jokes, puns and other such metaphorical expressions rampantly occur in our everyday speech. This paper examines the abstract notion of sarcasm with special reference to Hindi language within the framework of conceptual integration theory. A corpus of five thousand sentences has been procured from Indian Language Technology Proliferation and Deployment Centre (TDIL) for the present study. The findings of the existing paper aim to provide a theoretical understanding of how Hindi sarcasm is perceived among the native speakers.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs, 46 (4), 587-634.
Campbell, J. D., & Katz, A. N. (2012). Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes, 49 (6), 459-480.
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning A social function of Irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 3-19.
Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (8), 1239-1256.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive science, 22 (2), 133-187.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., & O'Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of pragmatics, 16 (6), 523-530.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse processes, 19 (2), 239-264.
Goalty, A. (1997). The language of metaphor. London/New York: Routledge.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P., Cole, P., & Morgan, J. L. (1975). Syntax and Semantics . New York: Academic Press.
Joshi, A., Bhattacharyya, P., & Carman, M. J. (2017). Automatic sarcasm detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50 (5), 73.
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 118 (4), 374.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. J., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought (Vol. 28). New York: Basic Books.
Prokofiev, G. (2017). Differentiation between irony and sarcasm in contemporary linguistic studies. Вісник Дніпропетровського університету імені Альфреда Нобеля. Серія: Філологічні науки, 13(1), 233-239.
Ramos, F. Y. (2000). Literal/non literal and the processing of verbal irony. Pragmalingüística (8-9), 349-374.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology, 19(3), 288.
Tay, D. (2014). Lakoff and the Theory of Conceptual Metaphor. In J. Littlemore, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 49-59). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Copyright (c) 2019 Sweta Sinha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published online in journal Acta Linguistica Asiatica by Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.