Understanding Sarcastic Metaphorical Expression in Hindi through Conceptual Integration Theory

Keywords: Cognitive Linguistics, Metaphor, Sarcasm, Irony, Conceptual blending, Figurative language


Metaphorical expressions are one of the most indispensable aspects of human language, thought and action. Their meanings are figurative, which in other words means that they carry literal meanings, which are in direct opposition to the intended or primary meanings. Metaphors are not only limited to being used in figurative writing and speaking but they are also pervasively used in everyday language. Irony, sarcasm, jokes, puns and other such metaphorical expressions rampantly occur in our everyday speech. This paper examines the abstract notion of sarcasm with special reference to Hindi language within the framework of conceptual integration theory. A corpus of five thousand sentences has been procured from Indian Language Technology Proliferation and Deployment Centre (TDIL) for the present study. The findings of the existing paper aim to provide a theoretical understanding of how Hindi sarcasm is perceived among the native speakers.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sandeep Kumar SHARMA, Indian Institute of Technology Patna

Research Scholar, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Patna

Sweta SINHA, Indian Institute of Technology Patna

Assistant Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Patna


Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs, 46 (4), 587-634.

Campbell, J. D., & Katz, A. N. (2012). Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony? Discourse Processes, 49 (6), 459-480.

Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning A social function of Irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(1), 3-19.

Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (8), 1239-1256.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive science, 22 (2), 133-187.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Gibbs Jr, R. W., & O'Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of pragmatics, 16 (6), 523-530.

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse processes, 19 (2), 239-264.

Goalty, A. (1997). The language of metaphor. London/New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H. P., Cole, P., & Morgan, J. L. (1975). Syntax and Semantics . New York: Academic Press.

Joshi, A., Bhattacharyya, P., & Carman, M. J. (2017). Automatic sarcasm detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50 (5), 73.

Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 118 (4), 374.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. J., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought (Vol. 28). New York: Basic Books.

Prokofiev, G. (2017). Differentiation between irony and sarcasm in contemporary linguistic studies. Вісник Дніпропетровського університету імені Альфреда Нобеля. Серія: Філологічні науки, 13(1), 233-239.

Ramos, F. Y. (2000). Literal/non literal and the processing of verbal irony. Pragmalingüística (8-9), 349-374.

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology, 19(3), 288.

Tay, D. (2014). Lakoff and the Theory of Conceptual Metaphor. In J. Littlemore, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 49-59). London, UK: Bloomsbury.

Supporting Agencies
Indian language Technology Proliferation and Deployment Centre, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India
How to Cite
SHARMAS. K., & SINHAS. (2019). Understanding Sarcastic Metaphorical Expression in Hindi through Conceptual Integration Theory. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 9(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.9.1.89-103
Research Articles