Understanding Reference: Morphological Marking in Japanese

  • Shinichi SHOJI Mie University
Keywords: reference, subject, object, topic, scrambling

Abstract

This study investigates reference resolution with repeated-name anaphors in Japanese, particularly focusing on (i) subject anaphor with the nominative postposition ga, (ii) topic-subject anaphor with the topic postposition wa, (iii) scrambled object anaphor with the accusative postposition o, and (iv) topic-object anaphor with the topic postposition wa. A self-paced sentence-by-sentence reading experiment was conducted using two-sentence discourse items followed by comprehension questions, aiming to examine which type of anaphor would trigger a faster realization of the anaphor-antecedent relationship. The discourse items included antecedents in the first sentence and anaphors in the second sentences, and the comprehension questions asked about the antecedents in the first sentences. Results showed that the comprehension questions for the discourses that included topic anaphors (topic-subject-wa and topic-object-wa) were responded to faster than those for the discourses that included non-topic anaphors (subject-ga and scrambled object-o). The results indicate that anaphors’ topic-hood given by wa facilitates the realization of antecedents.

Author Biography

Shinichi SHOJI, Mie University

Assistant professor

Organization for the development of higher educaiton and regional human resources

Mie University

References

Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge.

Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding (pp. 21-52) Amserdam: John Benjamins.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32(2), 99-156. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467536/

Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J. & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.

Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22, 389-424.

Gundel, J. K. (1988). The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. New York: Garland Publishing.

Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274-307.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 377-417.

Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.

Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Nakayama, M. (1990). Accessibility to the antecedents in Japanese sentence comprehension. Unpublished manuscript.

Nishimura, M. (1989). The topic-comment construction in Japanese-English code-switching. World Englishes, 8, 365–377.

Prince, E. F. (1978). On the function of existential presupposition in discourse. Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Published
2017-06-28
How to Cite
SHOJI, S. (2017). Understanding Reference: Morphological Marking in Japanese. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 7(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.7.1.9-21
Section
Research Articles