Improving Students' Language Performance Through Consistent Use of E-Learning: An Empirical Study in Japanese, Korean, Hindi and Sanskrit
This paper describes the backing theories, methodology, and results of a two-semester long case study of the application of technology in teaching four Asian languages (Japanese, Korean, Hindi, and Sanskrit) to Croatian students. We have developed e-learning materials to follow the curriculum in Croatia and deployed them in Asian language classrooms. Students who agreed to participate in the study were tested before using the materials, and after each semester, and their progress was surveyed. In the case of Japanese students (N=53), we have thoroughly monitored their usage and compared the progress of students who have diligently studied vocabulary and grammar using our materials on Memrise, and those who have neglected their studies. This was measured through their scores on the Memrise, which shows the user's activity. Also, their progress was measured using standardized tests that were designed in such a manner to resemble Japanese Language Proficiency Test. We have found that frequent users progressed averagely 20,3% after each semester, while non-frequent users have progressed only 11,6%, proving this method to be related to stable and constant use of e-materials.
Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes toward the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language learning 15(3), 241–249.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). Cambridge, the United Kingdom: Cambridge. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/cadre_en.asp. Framework_EN.pdf
Creative Commons. (2016). Creative Commons. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://creativecommons.org/.
De la Rouviere, J. (2013). Chinese radicals in spaced repetition systems: a pilot study on the acquisition of Chinese characters by students learning Chinese as a foreign language. M. Phil dissertation, Stellenbosch University.
Golonka, E.M., Bowles, A.R., Frank, V.M., Richardson, D.L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70–105.
Hanson-Smith, E. (2002). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. (pp. 107–113). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Janjić, M., Librenjak, S., & Kocijan, K. (2016). Croatian Students` Attitudes Towards Technology Usage in Teaching Asian Languages – a Field Research. Mipro proceedings 2016. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://docs.mipro-proceedings.com/ce/ce_34_3870.pdf.
JLPT Japanese-Language Proficiency Test. (2016). Jlpt.jp. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://www.jlpt.jp/e/index.cgi.
Kuo, M. (2008). Learner to teacher: EFL student teachers' perceptions on internet-assisted language learning and teaching. Online Submission. Education Resources Information Center.
Learning tools & flashcards, for free | Quizlet. (2016). Quizlet.com. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://quizlet.com/.
Mashhadizadeh D., & Rezvani, E. (2015). Iranian EFL learners' attitude towards the use of WBLL approach in writing. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 5.
Materijali | MemAzija. (2016). Memazija.ffzg.unizg.hr. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://memazija.ffzg.unizg.hr/index.php/ankete/materijali/.
McLaren, A. E., & Bettinson, M. (2016). Digital Tools for Chinese Character Acquisition and Their Impact on Student Motivation. In R. Moloney & H. L. Xu (Eds.), Exploring Innovative Pedagogy in the Teachingand Learning of Chinese as a Foreign Language (pp. 235–251). Multilingual Education 15, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-772-7_13.
Memrise – Learn something new every day. (2016). Memrise. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://www.memrise.com/.
Rahimi M., & Yadollahi S. (2011). Foreign language learning attitude as a predictor of attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 167–174.
Schmidt, R. & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Simkova, M., Tomaskova, H., & Nemcova, Z. (2012). Mobile education in tools. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 10–13.
Skritter – Learn to Write Chinese and Japanese Characters. (2016). Skritter.com. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://www.skritter.com/.
Tam, V., & Huang, C. (2012). An intelligent e-learning software for learning to write correct Chinese characters on mobile devices. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 9(4), 191–203.
The official website for comparing UK higher education course data – Unistats. (2016). Unistats.direct.gov.uk. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://unistats.direct.gov.uk/ when entered data for Japanese course (direct link not available).
TOPIK 한국어능력시험. (2016). Topik.go.kr. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://www.topik.go.kr/usr/lang/index.do?home_seq=221.
Yushau, B. (2006). The Effects of Blended Elearning on Mathematics and Computer Attitudesi. Pre-Calculus Algebra, The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3(2), 176–183.
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57–71.
Wiebe, G., & Kabata, K. (2010). Students' and instructors' attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language LearningI, 23(3), 221–234.
Copyright (c) 2016 Marijana Janjic, Sara Librenjak, Kristina Kocijan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitting article, which will be published online in journal Acta Linguistica Asiatica by Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). Author’s name will be evident in the article in journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in hands of the publisher.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.