Focus and Scope
Verba Hispanica is an internationally renowned scientific journal of linguistics and literature, in which recognized local and foreign experts publish original discussions in the Romance languages of the Iberian Peninsula (Spanish, Portuguese, Catalan and Galician). It is the only scientific journal in Slovenia in which are represented scientific achievements in the field of linguistics, literature and culture of the Iberoromanic and Latin American worlds. It has been annually published since 1991.
The journal has a multi-partite design. The introductory part is devoted to the presentation of the tematic issue. The central part (LINGÜÍSTICA, LITERATURA) is intended for original scientific articles in the field of linguistics and literature. In the third part (RESEÑAS) are published reviews of the latest scientific and professional publications.
Peer Review Process
All received contributions are reviewed according to the principle of blind review. Relevance of each article is assessed by two reviewers (one of them is from an International Editorial Board). The final decision for the publication is adopted by the editorial board. Reviewers will elaborate a Review according to the guidelines of the review form (available at this link) for each received contribution, in which they accurately describe the reasons for the publication, further revision or rejection of the estimated contribution. Throughout the entire peer review process anonymity of both, authors and evaluators, is guaranteed. The reviews of papers should be submitted no later than three months after the receipt of the original text, except in unforeseeable circumstances.
Verba Hispanica is published one issue per year.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to the full-text of articles at no cost on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
There is no Article Processing Fee charged to authors and articles are immediately available on the journal website once published.
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal Verba Hispanica is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. It is therefore necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor (and the editorial board), the peer reviewer and the publisher.
The Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani) as publisher of the journal Verba Hispanica takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana and the editorial board of Verba Hispanica will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and on existing Elsevier policies.
Duties of authors
Reporting standards: authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data access and retention: authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and plagiarism: the authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: an author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation as the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.
Acknowledgement of sources: proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
Authorship of the paper: authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and human subjects: if the work involves the use of human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subject must always be observed.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest: all authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Fundamental errors in published works: when an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.
Duties of the editor and editorial board
Publication decisions: the editor of the journal Verba Hispanica is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may consult with editorial board or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play: the editor evaluates manuscripts solely for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality: the editor and any editorial staff do not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest: unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript are not used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask another member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections in competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.
Involvement and cooperation in investigations: an editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institution and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant. Every reported act of unethical publishing behaviour must be looked into, even if it discovered years after publication.
Duties of reviewers
Contribution to editorial decisions: peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness: any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality: any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of objectivity: reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of sources: reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and conflict of interest:unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask another member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers.
Abstracting and Indexing
The articles of Verba Hispanica are indexed/reviewed in the following databases/resources:
- BL Bibliographie Linguistique
- MLA International Bibliography
- ERIH PLUS
Journal Verba Hispanica is supportted by:
Sources of Support
Journal Verba Hispanica is supportted by:
Verba Hispanica is an annual journal published by the Department of Spanish Language and Literature at the Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana and has been published regularly since 1991. The birth of the journal was a result of hard work of an enthusiastic group of Spanish teachers led by prof. dr. Mitja Skubic, director of the magazine, and Spanish teacher Matías Escalera Cordero, secretary of the magazine, with the financial support of the Embassy of Spain and the Faculty of Arts at the University of Ljubljana. The first drafting committee consisted of professors Branka Kalenic Ramšak, Jasmina Markič, Juan Carlos Oven, Juan Octavio Zrimec Prenz and Nubia Zrimec.
The journal is devoted to topics in the field of linguistics and Spanish, Portuguese, Catalan and Galician literature (articles are published in the languages of the Iberian Peninsula) and has an annual circulation of 300 to 400. The first issue of the magazine consisted of five sections: Literature, Linguistics, Varia (section devoted to other topics: historical, cultural, translational, etc.), They Are The Future (section dedicated to the publication of student work) and Reviews. It is noteworthy to mention the photo of historic value which follows the editorial in the first issue: it was taken in 1965 in Bled, Slovenia, and represents a group of important figures: Chilean poet Pablo Neruda; Guatemalan writer and poet Miguel Ángel Asturias, Slovenian writer Ciril Kosmač, and Argentinian professor and writer Juan Octavio Prenz. From the second issue (1992) a special section is devoted to the presentation of Slovenian writers who have been translated into several languages of the Iberian Peninsula.
The journal Verba Hispanica has expanded its network exchanges with renowned international journals; today there are more then 40 (see annex). Authors who have published their unpublished papers in the journal are researchers and professors from different universities and research centers in Slovenia and around the world, to mention only some: Bernardo Atxaga, Ángel Bassanta, Manuel Casado Velarde, Elena de Miguel, Humberto Hernández, Dieter Messner, Gonzalo Navajas, Clara Nunes Correia, Ludovik Osterc, Julio Rodríguez Puértolas, Juan Octavio Prenz, Alfredo Saldaña, Mitja Skubic, Stanislav Zimic and many others.
From the first issue in 1991 to number XIX the cover is illustrated by a caricature by Franco Juri in which Don Quixote and Sancho Panza ride the dragon of Ljubljana. The color of the magazine was violet untill issue No. X and red untill No. XIX. Number XX (2012) was published on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of Hispanic studies in Slovenia and 20 years since the first publication of Verba Hispanica in 1991. With this issue Verba Hispanica acquires a new image: a rich binding with a sleek cover bearing the title of the journal, and the back cover in marbled paper based on the tradition of Spansih marbling. Its typography gains a Hispanic character, as the journal is printed in Espinosa Nova, a font based on the type used by Antonio de Espinosa, the most important Mexican printer of the sixteenth century and most likely the first punchcutter anywhere on the American continent (1551). The author of the digitalized version of Espinosa Nova is the current Mexican typographer Cristóbal Henestrosa.