Methodological Problems of Xu Fuguan’s Comparative Analysis of Zhuangzi’s Aesthetics and Western Phenomenology

Tea SERNELJ

Abstract


The present article deals with Xu Fuguan’s analysis and interpretation of some of the central concepts of Zhuangzi’s philosophy, which constitute his aesthetic thought. In Xu’s view, Zhuangzi’s aesthetic thought relates to the aesthetic way of human life, where beauty applies to the realm of dao in which human beings are able to liberate their spirit and enjoy a way of life denoted as the “free and easy wandering” (xiaoyaoyou 逍遙遊). In Xu’s view, this is the highest and the most beautiful sphere of human existence, and is as such expressed in art. Xu found in Zhuangzi’s concepts of xinzhai 心齋 and zuowang 坐忘,as methods for achieving this highest level of being, some similarities with certain concepts of late nineteenth and early twentieth century Western phenomenology. Although Xu was trying to be careful in drawing parallels between certain Western philosophies and Zhuangzi’s thought, he believed that there is a certain resemblance between them, especially regarding the question of why and in which way human consciousness (or the human heart-mind) is able to perceive the world aesthetically. The article aims to show some methodological problems and inconsistencies in this comparative approach, which underlies Xu’s aesthetic theory.

Keywords


Xu Fuguan, Zhuangzi, Chinese Aesthetics, intercultural methodology

Full Text:

PDF (Slovenščina)

References


Cheng, Chung-ying. 2010. “A Study in the Onto – Aesthetics of Beauty and Art: Fullness (chongshi) and Emptiness (kongling) as Two Polarties in Chinese Aesthetics.” V Asian Aesthetics, uredil Ken’ichi Sasaki, 128–38. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.

Deranty, Jean-Philippe. 2015. “Existentialist Aesthetics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), uredil Edward N. Zalta. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/

aesthetics-existentialist/.

Ginsborg, Hannah. 2014. “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), uredil Edward N. Zalta. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/kant-aesthetics/.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1975. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art, prevedel T. M. Knox, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

–––. 2008. Philosophy of Mind. Translated from the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. New York: Cosimo.

Heidegger, Martin. 2008. “On the Origin of the Work of Art.” V Basic Writings. 1st Harper Perennial Modern Thought Edition, uredil David Farrell Krell, 143–212. New York: Harper Collins.

Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment, prevedel Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Lee, Su San. 1998. “Xu Fuguan and New Confucianism in Taiwan (1949–1969): A Cultural History of the Exile Generation.” Doktorska disertacija. Rhode Island: Brown University.

Li, Zehou. 2010. The Chinese Aesthetic Tradition. Hawaii: University of Hawai’ Press.

Li, Zehou in Jane Clauvel. 2006. Four Essays on Aesthetics. Oxford: Lexington books.

Liao Hsien-hao, Sebastian. 2014. “Becoming Butterfly: Power of the False, Crystal Image and Zhuangzian Onto–Aesthetics.” V Deleuze and Asia, uredili Ronald Bogue, Hanping Chiu in Yu-lin Lee, 1–29. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Redding, Paul. 2016. “Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), uredil Edward N. Zalta. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/

hegel/.

Rošker, S. Jana. 2014. “The Philosophical Sinification of Modernity and the Modern Confucian Paradigm of Immanent Transcendence (內在超越性).” Asian Studies 2/18 (1): 67–81.

Schiller, Friedrich. 2016. “Letters Upon the Aesthetic Education of Man (1794).” V Modern History Sourcebook. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://sourcebooks. fordham.edu/halsall/mod/schiller-education.asp.

Sernelj, Téa. 2015. “Xu Fuguan’s Comparison of the Concept You in Zhuangzi’s and Kongzi’s Aesthetics.” V Contemporary East Asia and the Confucian Revival, uredili Jana S. Rošker in Nataša Visočnik, 43–59. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Smith, David Woodruff. 2013. “Phenomenology.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), uredil Edward N. Zalta. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/

phenomenology/.

Thomson, Iain. 2015. “Heidegger’s Aesthetics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), uredil Edward N. Zalta. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/heidegger-aesthetics/.

Xu, Fuguan. 1966. Zhongguo yishu jingshen 中國藝術精神 (The Spirit of Chinese Art). Taipei: Guojia tushuguan chubanshe.

Ye, Lang. 2010. “Several Inspirations from Traditional Chinese Aesthetic.” V Asian Aesthetics, uredil Ken’ichi Sasaki, 112–8. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.

Zhuangzi 莊子. s.d. V: Chinese text project, Pre-Qin in Han. Dostop 20. avgust, 2016. http://ctext.org/zhuangzi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.1.271-288

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Tea Sernelj

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts
(Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani) 

Print ISSN: 2232-5131
Online ISSN: 2350-4226