In the Shadow of the Decay. The Philosophy of History of Mencius and Xunzi

Dawid ROGACZ

Abstract


The aim of my paper is to analyze the debate between Mencius and Xunzi from the perspective of their views on the nature of the historical process. The Mencian approach embraces not only elaboration on the doctrine of the Mandate of Heaven, resulting in a cyclical vision of history, but also strong idealization of the past. I will show that ren (benevolence), treated as a historical principle, could link two dimensions of his historical thinking: the moral and ontological. Xunzi rejected the possibility of the intervention of Heaven in history, however, his theory of rituals and belief in moral use of history made his philosophy of history much more conservative, embalming the idealization of the past. In short, I will look for the main common points and differences between these two major figures of Confucianism regarding their views on history, attempting to answer which beliefs could constitute a unique Confucian philosophy of history.

Keywords


Confucianism, Mencius, Xunzi, philosophy of history, Mandate of Heaven, idealization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chong, Kim C. 2003. “Xunzi’s Systematic Critique of Mencius.” Philosophy East and West 53 (2): 215–33.

Cua, A. S. 2005. Human Nature, Ritual, and History: Studies in Xunzi and Chinese Philosophy. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 43. Washington, D.C. Catholic University of America Press.

Danto, Arthur C. 1968. Analytical Philosophy of History. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

El Amine, Loubna. 2015. Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Eno, Robert. 1990. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. SUNY series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Albany, N.Y. State Univ. of New York Press.

Jiyuan, Yu. 2005. “Human Nature and Virtue in Mencius and Xunzi: An Aristotelian interpretation.” Dao 5 (1): 11–30.

Kim, Sungmoon. 2011. “Confucian Constitutionalism: Mencius and Xunzi on Virtue, Ritual, and Royal Transmission.” Rev Pol 73 (3): 371–99.

——. 2012. “Before and after Ritual: Two Accounts of Li as Virtue in Early Confucianism.” SOPHIA 51 (2): 195–210.

——. 2016. “Achieving the Way: Confucian Virtue Politics and the Problem of Dirty Hands.” Philosophy East and West 66 (1): 152–76.

Kongzi 孔子. 2016. Lunyu 論語. Chinese Text Project, pre-Qin and Han. Accessed November 17, 2016. http://ctext.org/analects.

Legge, James. 1861. The Works of Mencius. The Chinese Classics, vol. 2. Reprinted (1895). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Liu, Jeeloo. 2001. “Is Human History Predestined in Wang Fuzhi’s Cosmology?” Journal Chinese Philosophy 28 (3): 321–38.

Lodén, Torbjörn. 2009. “Reason, Feeling an Ethics in Mencius and Xunzi.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (4): 602–17.

Ng, On-cho, and Q. E. Wang. 2005. Mirroring the Past: The Writing and Use of History in Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Nivison, David S., and Bryan W. van Norden. 1996. The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.

Rüsen, Jörn. 2007. “Crossing Cultural Borders: How to Understand Historical Thinking in China and the West.” History and Theory 46 (2): 189–93.

Rüsen, Jörn, Rafał Żytyniec, Robert Traba, and Holger Thünemann. 2015. Nadawanie historycznego sensu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka i Innowacje.

Sima, Qian 司馬遷. 2016. Shiji 史記. Chinese Text Project, pre-Qin and Han. Accessed November 17, 2016. http://ctext.org/shiji.

Shang, Yang, and J. J. L. Duyvendak. 2011. The Book of Lord Shang: A Classic of the Chinese School of Law. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

Soles, David E. 2008. “The Nature and Grounds of Xunzi’s Disagreement with Mencius.” Asian Philosophy 9 (2): 123–33.

Twiss, Sumner B., and Jonathan Chan. 2012. “The Classical Confucian Position on the Legitimate Use of Military Force.” Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3): 447–72.

Xunzi, and John Knoblock. 1988. A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

——. 1990. A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

——. 1994. A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

Zeng, Zhenyu 曾振宇. 2013. “Advocate Goodness of Human Nature to Anyone Coming Across: Analysis on Good Nature Theory of Mencius.” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 19: 81–108.

Zhuangzi 莊子. 2016. Nan hua zhen jing 南化真經. Chinese Text Project, pre-Qin and Han. Accessed November 17, 2016. http://ctext.org/zhuangzi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/as.2017.5.1.147-171

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Dawid Rogacz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts
(Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani) 

Print ISSN: 2232-5131
Online ISSN: 2350-4226